Difference between revisions of "Factoid/2016/10/25"
From Beachapedia
< Beachapedia:Factoid | 2016 | 10
BPFactiodBot (talk | contribs) m (Bot has tweeted the factoid) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Factoid Headline=Captain Sam's Spit is Not a Suitable Building Site | |Factoid Headline=Captain Sam's Spit is Not a Suitable Building Site | ||
|Factoid Text="Hurricane Matthew wasn’t the monster that had been predicted for the South Carolina coast. But it should disabuse builders of the would-be merits of constructing 50 high-end houses on this vulnerable spit in the path of a powerful sea and future storms." - excerpt from [http://www.postandcourier.com/opinion/editorials/hurricane-confirms-instability-of-capt-sam-s-spit/article_1cba2d94-9643-11e6-8d44-974a15f79888.html editorial in The Post and Courier]. [http://surfrider.org/campaigns/protect-captain-sams-spit More on this]. | |Factoid Text="Hurricane Matthew wasn’t the monster that had been predicted for the South Carolina coast. But it should disabuse builders of the would-be merits of constructing 50 high-end houses on this vulnerable spit in the path of a powerful sea and future storms." - excerpt from [http://www.postandcourier.com/opinion/editorials/hurricane-confirms-instability-of-capt-sam-s-spit/article_1cba2d94-9643-11e6-8d44-974a15f79888.html editorial in The Post and Courier]. [http://surfrider.org/campaigns/protect-captain-sams-spit More on this]. | ||
| − | |Emailed/Tweeted= | + | |Emailed/Tweeted=Yes |
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:59, 25 October 2016
Captain Sam's Spit is Not a Suitable Building Site
- "Hurricane Matthew wasn’t the monster that had been predicted for the South Carolina coast. But it should disabuse builders of the would-be merits of constructing 50 high-end houses on this vulnerable spit in the path of a powerful sea and future storms." - excerpt from editorial in The Post and Courier. More on this.
Factoid has been Emailed/Tweeted: Yes
| Coastal Factoids Archive | Coastal Factoids on Twitter | Coastal Factoids RSS Feed |